Morning Call: Reform UK doesn’t like you

The party has pledged to build detention centres in areas that do not vote for it

Good morning.

The Prime Minister will convene a summit in Downing Street today to address anti-Semitism following a series of attacks on British Jews. The terror threat level has been raised to “severe”, and the Prime Minister is expected to announce £1.5m in new funding to protect Jewish communities and tackle anti-Semitism.

---

Subscribe to the New Statesman and save 75 per cent with our special spring offer

---

Reform UK announced a new policy over the weekend. If elected, the party said it will ensure that all constituencies voting for Reform are exempt from housing migrants in detention camps, and that all such camps will instead be built in seats that vote for “open borders” parties, primarily the Greens.

While there appeared to be an element of flippancy, this was not a gaffe but a fully premeditated media campaign, complete with an interactive postcode search feature on the party’s website telling users whether their constituency would be the site of one of these camps (based on the likelihood of it switching to the Greens at the next election).

There was outrage, including from Conservatives, and the gimmick conveniently distracts from a story the party has been keen to avoid commenting on (and so it bears repeating here: it has emerged that, before becoming an MP, Nigel Farage received a £5m “personal gift” from Christopher Harborne, a cryptocurrency investor based in Thailand, which he did not properly declare. The Reform leader said he had been given the money to pay for personal protection).

It is a vulgar expression of something it was once considered impolite to mention: the growing particularism in our politics, where local or group interests are placed above notions of the national interest. But how far is too far? While governing parties in recent years have had a habit of pork-barrelling their key seats – Boris Johnson’s levelling-up effort, targeted at the Red Wall, and Keir Starmer’s Pride in Place scheme – this proposal would be the inverse: a form of ritual punishment for the loser. The response from Reform supporters – that Green voters must welcome migrant detention centres because they are not immigration restrictionists – is, of course, nonsense.

The party has a bit of form on this. Its losing candidate in the Gorton and Denton by-election, Matt Goodwin, exited that contest ungraciously, describing the voters as “a coalition of Islamist and woke progressives” and questioning the legitimacy of the result. There is a longer history here too – a common analysis of Margaret Thatcher’s premiership is that she subjugated those who did not vote for her in order to enrich those who did – but it has never been so transparent. At least Reform is being honest when it addresses the more than 70 per cent of voters who say they do not support the party: we do not like you.

---

Ethan’s picks

An interesting development in the Financial Times: Jeevun Sandher, a loyalist from the 2024 intake and a parliamentary private secretary, has broken ranks and urged the government to start “taxing for growth” (paywalled)

Anoosh has been to the classic Tory–Labour bellwether and the home of “Stevenage Woman” to look at the way politics is changing in the run-up to Thursday’s elections

This article caused a bit of a stir online over the weekend: Anthony Seldon, a scholar of past prime ministers, explains why Keir Starmer should appoint Tony Blair as foreign secretary

---

And with that…

Thanks for reading. Please get in touch with any feedback by emailing ethan.croft@newstatesman.co.uk

—Ethan