Good morning. Labour’s manifesto should not have surprised you. Nothing new was announced. Instead, it is a 136-page collation of the policies – which have been abundant, whatever critics say – that Labour has announced over the past two years. The tone, content and message are familiar: the country is broken; Labour will fix it.
This predictability reveals the key fact about this election: that the result was decided long before by Labour’s wily manoeuvres and the Conservatives’ self-immolation. For the first time, a poll last night had Reform beating the Tories (Ben discusses that below). I naively thought the Conservatives would feign unity and professionalism once Rishi Sunak called an election because it would determine whether they were employed or not. But even self-preservation, that defining Tory characteristic, has been put aside.
To enjoy our latest election news and analysis with unlimited access to our coverage, click here to subscribe to the New Statesman. You’ll enjoy all of the New Statesman’s online content, ad-free podcasts and invitations to NS events.
The Tories briefed for months that a head-to-head, presidential-style election would benefit Sunak. Labour disagrees. Keir Starmer is plastered across the party’s manifesto. His foreword is entitled “My plan for change”. In it, he strikes a nationalist tone (“Every great nation is held together by shared beliefs. To outsiders they may not seem exceptional or distinctive, but they are essential for a sense of collective national purpose… We are still a great nation”). He criticised the Corbyn project’s “gesture politics”, by which he means the obsession with identity and ambitious economic plans.
Most striking was his promise to eject from government the principles that have guided administrations since 2010. (“We can turn the page on a set of ideas that, over 14 years, have consistently left us more vulnerable.”) That is ambitious. He is promising to usher in a new politics.
Which invites the question: how different is Labour to the Tories? If the Conservative Party was not so incoherent, disunited and enamoured with cutting taxes, then Labour’s promised departure could be interpreted as the latest iteration of the shift towards a more active state, a scepticism towards immigration, and the prioritisation of public services over austerity. Labour’s manifesto offers similar promises and solutions to the 2019 Conservative manifesto, with the added promise to restore dignity to public life. But the Conservatives messed things up. There have been too many versions of Conservatism since 2010 to provide a simple answer to the above question.
With today’s Tories at least, there are now some clear dividing lines (as George sets out in his excellent analysis). Labour wants a more active state, for instance, which in practice means encouraging local government’s control of buses, taking rail back into public ownership, and unashamedly promoting infrastructure building. Labour does not match the Tories’ wild promises to cut taxes, either. Nor could you imagine the current Conservative Party promising to improve workers’ rights in the way Labour is.
But being different to the Tories does not make a party radical. Labour’s priority “to rebuild Britain” seems to be “to change how Britain is governed”, rather than establishing a new political consensus. The same message is summed up in Rachel Reeves’ promise that “stability is change”, or Starmer’s demand for probity and service in public life.
Adopting the Tories’ fiscal framework and staying silent on tax rises means that Labour is accepting some of the basic tenets of the political status quo. You wouldn’t expect the party to take risks in its manifesto. But that also makes the claim that Labour is turning away from the ideas of the past 14 years seem far-fetched – at least, for now.
Freddie’s picks
Fascinating portrait of the think-tanker-turned-Labour-candidate Torsten Bell from George.
Jennifer Jasmine White is sceptical that Starmer can be a working-class hero.
Interesting question posed by Chris Deerin: can Starmer prove the Union works for Scotland?
George reports on the New Statesman’s manifesto launch in our podcast’s daily election show:
Mailshot
David Sanger: Will Biden’s Ukraine help be enough?
Eric Levitz: Will Biden beat inflation and lose the election?
Ross Barkan: Will Trump trigger a second awokening?
Michael Knox Beran: Abraham Lincoln, political poet
Anne Matthews: Was Charles Darwin lactose intolerant?
Ben’s take
It’s a development: Reform has edged the Conservatives in an opinion poll.
It is just one poll, and it’s a one-percentage-point lead. But I have to disagree with a number of my colleagues on social media picking the latest YouGov polling apart. Noisy polling isn’t new. It’s par for the course for YouGov, both before and after its recent change of methodology. And a lot of what it’s showing isn’t far off what a lot of other pollsters are saying.
As to whether they can boast good-quality samples remains to be seen. But I would note this: pollsters beyond YouGov have found the Conservative lead over Reform narrowing. It’s inevitable that noisy samples would generate an infrequent Reform lead.
But what if it’s not just noise? What if this is a genuine development? I’m reminded of the period in which the Lib Dems led Labour right up until polling day in 2010 – so would caution getting too excited by this. But the share of Conservatives’ favourability towards Nigel Farage as leader is high – it’s greater than that felt towards Rishi Sunak. And the more we see of Farage, the more these Conservative voters, it seems, are willing to countenance a vote for him.
The Reform surge will only mean something if it sustains itself to polling day. And by extension, the Reform surge will only bear fruit if voters think they’re on to a winner. If Farage is seen as a genuine, winning option for up to three or four in ten Boris Johnson-backing 2019 Conservatives, then yes, this latest poll result could materialise – and yes, the results will be disastrous for the Conservatives.
Has Reform published a Manifesto because I know nothing of what they think they will do if the get into power. We all want fewer immigrants, lower taxes, better healthcare, services, etc. Are most Reform supporters just unable to imagine Labour winning the election?
John Woods