Morning Call: Late nights on the Rwanda
Plus: Andrew Marr reviews Tim Shipman’s new Brexit book.
Good morning. Just before midnight the Lords backed down to let the Rwanda bill become law. It aims to protect the scheme from legal challenges by declaring that Rwanda is indeed a safe country to send migrants. Rishi Sunak has said he expects flights to take off for Rwanda throughout the summer. Will it work? Thoughts below.
Then, Andrew reviews one of the most highly anticipated political books of the year: Tim Shipman’s insider account of the Brexit wars. Finally, Ben has a chart on the enduring unpopularity of Liz Truss.
Sign up for all that here:
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. This is the government’s third law to crack down on asylum seekers crossing the Channel. The previous two did not work, and it’s unclear whether this one will produce a different result. The political gamble is that flights leaving the tarmac for Africa will restore the government’s credibility on immigration. In other words, proof-of-concept could get them a hearing from a public that has long stopped listening. At that point, it would try to ram the narrative home that Labour will scrap a scheme that shows promise.
If that sounds unlikely to work, that’s because it is unlikely to work. Here’s another scenario: flights do take off and people still try to cross the Channel. At that point, the whole premise of the scheme – that only a few flights are needed to deter people from crossing into the UK – will be exposed as a failure.
In either case, don’t expect a poll boost for the Tories. They have long lost credibility with those on the right and left on immigration. Like nearly all other policy areas, voters think Labour would do a better job. As Rachel writes, the public has priorities beside the boat crossings, namely the cost-of-living crisis. That does not mean illegal immigration doesn’t matter. It does. But deporting a few hundred people amid a backlog of 50,000, with little time before the election, will not persuade sufficient numbers to turn the Tories’ fortunes around.
Which will be small consolation to those Conservative MPs nervously eyeing Reform’s healthy poll figures. I remember writing during the rebels’ long campaign to remove Boris Johnson that breaching the 30-point-mark between Labour and the Conservatives in the polls would be a significant psychological moment for Tory MPs. Imagine if they slip behind Reform.
These polling numbers mean that the Channel crossings will (probably) soon become Labour’s problem. This could prove tricky for Keir Starmer. Tory leadership hopefuls are poised to brandish their immigration-cutting credentials in the forthcoming contest by, for instance, promising to leave the European Convention on Human Rights. If the Tory party went down the anti-immigration route, not least to recover some votes from Reform, it could pose serious problems for a managerial Starmer government that scraps the Rwanda scheme in office. The boats won’t stop simply because No 10 has a new occupant. In the same way that Labour can’t talk about tax rises in opposition, the Conservatives might find attacking Labour over immigration easier when out of power. On that reading, Labour might pause before wishing the government’s latest plans to “stop the boats” fail.
Freddie’s picks
Sohrab snuck inside Columbia University’s pro-Palestinian camp out for this intriguing column. What he found surprised him.
Rachel investigates whether last night’s vote could unify the Tory party.
Confused about what a mission-driven government is? Ravi Gurumurthy, who worked on delivery under New Labour, explains.
Interesting column from Jason on the Angela Rayner controversy and what it means for her relationship with Starmer (Sunday Times).
It’s been three years since Uber and GMB signed their recognition agreement. Together they have delivered the first pension in the gig economy. But what is the future of work in 21st-century Britain? And how do we combine autonomy and flexibility with security and representation? Join our panel of experts for a New Statesman podcast produced in collaboration with Uber, to discuss all of this and more.
Theresa May’s legacy of chaos
When that great historian Edward Gibbon presented the Duke of Gloucester with the second volume of his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, King George III’s brother reportedly replied to the author: “Another damned thick, square book! Always scribble, scribble, scribble! Eh, Mr Gibbon?”
Tim Shipman is a highly traditional political journalist. That is meant as a compliment: he asks people at or near power questions and writes down the answers and reports them. What the Roman empire was for Gibbon, Brexit is for the man universally known as Shippers.
The first of his Westminster chronicles, All Out War (2016), came in at 688 pages, covered the Brexit referendum and its immediate aftermath and was described (by me) as “essential”. The next, Fall Out (2017), focused on Theresa May’s struggles to make sense of the result and the catastrophe for her of the 2017 election. It was housed within an austere 592 pages. Now, No Way Out takes the story through the rest of her miserable parliamentary struggle, up to the rise of Boris Johnson as prime minister. This thick, square book unbuckles its belt a couple of notches and spans 670 pages. Attentive – and perhaps increasingly nervous – readers, will note that this story is by no means finished. Indeed, Mr Shipman promises a final volume, Out (though “Rout” might turn out to be a better title).
Click through to the NS to read the rest, or MC subscribers can read in full in-email.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Morning Call to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.